military intervention in Libya is an assurance that the masters of the world, or better said the United States and his band of countries, can attack any nation that does not abide to guidelines established by geopolitical international imperialism, particularly in the case of oil-rich territories light as Iraq and Libya. journalist Walter Martinez said in a broadcast of his program Dossier that when U.S. and European powers realized that the Libyan army was making progress against Rebel forces trying to overthrow President Muammar Gaddafi of Libya, they decided to make a military attack on the oil rich country in North Africa.
discussions within the UN between the usual brass and the rest of the world's nations were only a diplomatic circus and the media to justify an attack military was already preparing against an Arab-African nation, defenseless against the power arms of the world's major military powers.
The president of the new Rome pseudo Barack Obama, tragicomic Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, is the ruler over this new conflict in that the U.S. decides not to take a step without the unconditional support of their European partners, especially after the lessons from the bitter defeat in the Vietnam War where they were overcome by fatigue, despite its macabre achievements in the field or said more clearly, the loss of thousands of lives, war that had to fight all alone, without the direct support of other important armies.
The unfortunate UN Resolution 1973 was adopted on Thursday 18 March by the Security Council multinational organization with 10 votes in favor of its members and only five abstentions, the countries that saved his vote were Brazil, Germany, India, China and Russia. In the particular case of the latter two whose vote has power of veto by permanent membership, the question is, why not vote against?. It is obvious that the United States was going to go over, but the most worthy was that both China and Russia oppose, however, a weak and compliant position is a clear sign that the Yankees are still the powers that period. Y which sends commands captain sailor popular saying goes.
So far as reports by U.S. government spokespersons have launched 112 cruise missiles against Libyan air defenses and other targets, in a mega joint military action in which they have participated directly in its initial phase, U.S., France and Great Britain with the support of Greece, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Canada among the countries that have been explicitly allowed to see on stage.
pro-imperialist media of the right have used the euphemism brazen attacks against armed forces or against Gaddafi Gaddafi, but we know that they will pay the highest price are the nation and the people, because the missiles do not distinguish infallibly Army facility, a hospital, school or residential area, is the typical story of all the bombings. So far with conservative estimates there are about 64 dead and 150 wounded, the death toll increases accordingly with the number of wounded, many of whom eventually die.
Hospitals are overcrowded and the morgues are perhaps very soon if the rain of missiles intensifies, all is to end a ruthless dictator with 42 years in power, which was recently trading partner and great friend different presidents of European countries, including Italy and France.
The cynical pretext for military intervention "is supposed to .... Is that even laugh da!, Protect the civilian population of the constant attacks of the troops under Qaddafi, but the truth is that the president of Libya sum fans against a traditional enemy (USA) and continue to defend on two fronts, against the rebels trying to overthrow him and to foreign powers to attack the country and worst of all, the slaughter will be much higher. The material destruction complete an unnecessary disaster, what the kids call in NATO now, "collateral damage"
President Chavez upon learning of the bombing said:
... .. that irresponsibility and behind that the U.S. hand, the rule is imposed at the end ... they want is to own oil from Libya .... It is regrettable that the UN will pay for endorse the war, in contravention of its principles "(Noticiero de VTV, 03/19/1911)
oil wealth to Libya condemned because otherwise there would be no such concern for destroying the country, ending the Kadafi and seize all Oil your wonderful chest, available in a strategic position with respect to European markets.
"Libya has an estimated GDP for 2010 of about 76.557 billion dollars, with annual increase of 6.7%. Currently its annual exports of about U.S. $ 63,050 million compared with imports of 11,500 million give a broadly favorable trade balance and allow you to accumulate reserves by about 200,000 million dollars, supporting a negligible foreign debt of $ 5.521 million. This will report the highest GDP per capita ($ 14,534) and the best Human Development Index in Africa. Life expectancy is 74 years, infant mortality from 18 per l, 000 and illiteracy of 5.5%, expenditure on education is 2.7% of GDP while the defense does not exceed 1.1 % of GDP. "(When you see Burn Libya, Luis Brito Garcia, published in O OUTRO SIDE OF THE NEWS, 03/07/1911) What will these gains if the military campaign lasts too long and out of control as usual?
NATO does not officially involved in the conflict but the U.S. leader and key members of the organization such as France and Great Britain trailing in turn to other members in this military adventure in which an equation that arises is always repeated where "pandillita imperialist" arrives:
USA & ALLIES (NATO) = DESTRUCTION, CHAOS AND DEATH.
discussions within the UN between the usual brass and the rest of the world's nations were only a diplomatic circus and the media to justify an attack military was already preparing against an Arab-African nation, defenseless against the power arms of the world's major military powers.
The president of the new Rome pseudo Barack Obama, tragicomic Nobel Peace Prize in 2009, is the ruler over this new conflict in that the U.S. decides not to take a step without the unconditional support of their European partners, especially after the lessons from the bitter defeat in the Vietnam War where they were overcome by fatigue, despite its macabre achievements in the field or said more clearly, the loss of thousands of lives, war that had to fight all alone, without the direct support of other important armies.
The unfortunate UN Resolution 1973 was adopted on Thursday 18 March by the Security Council multinational organization with 10 votes in favor of its members and only five abstentions, the countries that saved his vote were Brazil, Germany, India, China and Russia. In the particular case of the latter two whose vote has power of veto by permanent membership, the question is, why not vote against?. It is obvious that the United States was going to go over, but the most worthy was that both China and Russia oppose, however, a weak and compliant position is a clear sign that the Yankees are still the powers that period. Y which sends commands captain sailor popular saying goes.
So far as reports by U.S. government spokespersons have launched 112 cruise missiles against Libyan air defenses and other targets, in a mega joint military action in which they have participated directly in its initial phase, U.S., France and Great Britain with the support of Greece, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Canada among the countries that have been explicitly allowed to see on stage.
pro-imperialist media of the right have used the euphemism brazen attacks against armed forces or against Gaddafi Gaddafi, but we know that they will pay the highest price are the nation and the people, because the missiles do not distinguish infallibly Army facility, a hospital, school or residential area, is the typical story of all the bombings. So far with conservative estimates there are about 64 dead and 150 wounded, the death toll increases accordingly with the number of wounded, many of whom eventually die.
Hospitals are overcrowded and the morgues are perhaps very soon if the rain of missiles intensifies, all is to end a ruthless dictator with 42 years in power, which was recently trading partner and great friend different presidents of European countries, including Italy and France.
The cynical pretext for military intervention "is supposed to .... Is that even laugh da!, Protect the civilian population of the constant attacks of the troops under Qaddafi, but the truth is that the president of Libya sum fans against a traditional enemy (USA) and continue to defend on two fronts, against the rebels trying to overthrow him and to foreign powers to attack the country and worst of all, the slaughter will be much higher. The material destruction complete an unnecessary disaster, what the kids call in NATO now, "collateral damage"
President Chavez upon learning of the bombing said:
... .. that irresponsibility and behind that the U.S. hand, the rule is imposed at the end ... they want is to own oil from Libya .... It is regrettable that the UN will pay for endorse the war, in contravention of its principles "(Noticiero de VTV, 03/19/1911)
oil wealth to Libya condemned because otherwise there would be no such concern for destroying the country, ending the Kadafi and seize all Oil your wonderful chest, available in a strategic position with respect to European markets.
"Libya has an estimated GDP for 2010 of about 76.557 billion dollars, with annual increase of 6.7%. Currently its annual exports of about U.S. $ 63,050 million compared with imports of 11,500 million give a broadly favorable trade balance and allow you to accumulate reserves by about 200,000 million dollars, supporting a negligible foreign debt of $ 5.521 million. This will report the highest GDP per capita ($ 14,534) and the best Human Development Index in Africa. Life expectancy is 74 years, infant mortality from 18 per l, 000 and illiteracy of 5.5%, expenditure on education is 2.7% of GDP while the defense does not exceed 1.1 % of GDP. "(When you see Burn Libya, Luis Brito Garcia, published in O OUTRO SIDE OF THE NEWS, 03/07/1911) What will these gains if the military campaign lasts too long and out of control as usual?
NATO does not officially involved in the conflict but the U.S. leader and key members of the organization such as France and Great Britain trailing in turn to other members in this military adventure in which an equation that arises is always repeated where "pandillita imperialist" arrives:
USA & ALLIES (NATO) = DESTRUCTION, CHAOS AND DEATH.
0 comments:
Post a Comment