The positive political country saw the return of the opposition to the National Assembly because it was thought, in principle, that she would return the height debate and criticism of the Government for it to take the necessary corrective measures in case any, and thus continue to benefit as many citizens as is the proper purpose of a democratic system. More than a month of installing the new parliament, Venezuelans have seen that the opponents of President Chavez came to the legislature to take his violent speech and in the least one pair of occasions, which have been televised live, have attempted to physically attack the President of the Assembly, Fernando Soto Rojas. The forum is just to discuss ideas for confronting them and this can not be confused with physical confrontations in which a Julio Borges or exalted will Alfonso Marquina slapping in the face and disrespect Soto Rojas or any other Member. In these early
regular meetings and seen the behavior of the opposition bloc might well ask what could be playing? Do you really want to act as deputies or arrived there to kick the table, retiring en masse and try to discredit the government instances with international and trite story that the "rrrr ... regime" autocratic does not allow free speech and thought?.
also adds the focus on speech exhausted that what they call "free and independent media" is not broadcast live parliamentary sessions. When launching this sort are referring to Globovisión on misrepresentation through most hypocritical and unethical that has ever existed in history. And then we ask Venezuelans, is that the channel of the National Assembly-no ANTV broadcast live all parliamentary debates, uncensored airwaves for all the nation?, because its signal is uploaded by the subscription television business. Obviously
ANTV transmitted the debates and interventions of each and every one of the members so far and its signal can be broadcast, even live in the country through other channels, including Globovision, said "news channel" and what it does is take him covering the news and ANTV Venezolana de Televisión, mostly without pay to staff so that it covers the same, ie, technicians and journalists. Relaying the official channel is easy to put together a so-called "news channel." Ethics to lose Globovisión when they use that material to twist and try to generate population-psychotic dissociation. How sad antivalores game!.
The deputies of opposition are down his speech that are not covered by "free and independent media" for journalists in the most public and private media statements contained on site of the Federal Legislative Palace. Or does not the fellow journalists of private media companies Venevision, El Universal, Televen, El Nacional, Latest News or the same Globovisión, to cite a few cases, covering the parliamentary source? Members who say journalists then, as the oppositional Miguel Angel Rodriguez. Are they or are not?. Well
noted by the director of Ultimas Noticias, Eleazar Diaz Rangel, in its opinion page on Sunday 02.13.2011, saying that "come in handy Conatel recent antics which disclosed the Minister Andres Izarra ( ...) In 1998 there were 331 private FM stations and 11 of the State, in 2010 the private sector increased by 135 stations and are now 466, the state rose to 82 and a new spectrum emerges, the community: 243. If added to the state are 325, while the "independent private" are 466 ". Continues the renowned journalist expressing "In terms of AM radios in 1998 there were 180 commercial and 25 state and 12 ads in 2010 disappear outside the law. Consider the TV: in 1998 there were 32 private and 8 state, and in 2010 there were 61 private, 13 state and 37 community. "
saw the picture above, numbers in hand that the opposition has been denied, we affirm that in twelve years of revolution, one of the sectors of the economy that has grown has been precisely that of social media. Here no one has censored his right to be heard, say, express or disseminate issues of national importance. In this government, freedom of speech and other constitutional rights are more relevant than ever, like all means "free and independent" claims that both the bourgeois opposition.
regular meetings and seen the behavior of the opposition bloc might well ask what could be playing? Do you really want to act as deputies or arrived there to kick the table, retiring en masse and try to discredit the government instances with international and trite story that the "rrrr ... regime" autocratic does not allow free speech and thought?.
also adds the focus on speech exhausted that what they call "free and independent media" is not broadcast live parliamentary sessions. When launching this sort are referring to Globovisión on misrepresentation through most hypocritical and unethical that has ever existed in history. And then we ask Venezuelans, is that the channel of the National Assembly-no ANTV broadcast live all parliamentary debates, uncensored airwaves for all the nation?, because its signal is uploaded by the subscription television business. Obviously
ANTV transmitted the debates and interventions of each and every one of the members so far and its signal can be broadcast, even live in the country through other channels, including Globovision, said "news channel" and what it does is take him covering the news and ANTV Venezolana de Televisión, mostly without pay to staff so that it covers the same, ie, technicians and journalists. Relaying the official channel is easy to put together a so-called "news channel." Ethics to lose Globovisión when they use that material to twist and try to generate population-psychotic dissociation. How sad antivalores game!.
The deputies of opposition are down his speech that are not covered by "free and independent media" for journalists in the most public and private media statements contained on site of the Federal Legislative Palace. Or does not the fellow journalists of private media companies Venevision, El Universal, Televen, El Nacional, Latest News or the same Globovisión, to cite a few cases, covering the parliamentary source? Members who say journalists then, as the oppositional Miguel Angel Rodriguez. Are they or are not?. Well
noted by the director of Ultimas Noticias, Eleazar Diaz Rangel, in its opinion page on Sunday 02.13.2011, saying that "come in handy Conatel recent antics which disclosed the Minister Andres Izarra ( ...) In 1998 there were 331 private FM stations and 11 of the State, in 2010 the private sector increased by 135 stations and are now 466, the state rose to 82 and a new spectrum emerges, the community: 243. If added to the state are 325, while the "independent private" are 466 ". Continues the renowned journalist expressing "In terms of AM radios in 1998 there were 180 commercial and 25 state and 12 ads in 2010 disappear outside the law. Consider the TV: in 1998 there were 32 private and 8 state, and in 2010 there were 61 private, 13 state and 37 community. "
saw the picture above, numbers in hand that the opposition has been denied, we affirm that in twelve years of revolution, one of the sectors of the economy that has grown has been precisely that of social media. Here no one has censored his right to be heard, say, express or disseminate issues of national importance. In this government, freedom of speech and other constitutional rights are more relevant than ever, like all means "free and independent" claims that both the bourgeois opposition.
0 comments:
Post a Comment